Martin> I sent you the data on how to access the training interface on
    Martin> May 2, 2008, msgid <481B7840.7070202@v.loewis.de>. No
    Martin> significant training was done since the installation was
    Martin> made. If this situation doesn't improve (i.e. spambayes only
    Martin> produces false positives), we should disable it.

Thanks Martin.  I'm plugged in and training now.  Not much actually gets
classified as spam so the training database will be very skewed in favor of
ham.  We'll see how that goes.

Skip

> Which reminds me...  I was going to take on some ask related to spam filtering, 
> but I no longer remember what it was, or even how to process spam through the 
> website.  Martin?

I sent you the data on how to access the training interface on May 2,
2008, msgid <481B7840.7070202@v.loewis.de>. No significant training was
done since the installation was made. If this situation doesn't improve
(i.e. spambayes only produces false positives), we should disable it.

Which reminds me...  I was going to take on some ask related to spam filtering, 
but I no longer remember what it was, or even how to process spam through the 
website.  Martin?

Skip

It's not clear why spambayes misclassified the message; it often does so for
very short messages. I reclassified it as ham now.

I wrote a comment in Bug Tracker and it has been classified as spam. Why?

Original message in issue 2683:
"What is wrong? Documentation or method?"