Issue301

Title SVN cleanup - remove vendor/
Priority bug Status chatting
Superseder Nosy List loewis, techtonik
Assigned To Topics

Created on 2009-09-17.12:20:10 by techtonik, last changed 2009-09-20.18:57:44 by techtonik.

Messages
msg1475 (view) Author: techtonik Date: 2009-09-20.18:57:43
From that I can see the version in vendor branch doesn't match the version of 
the tracker instances used.

If there is a reason for that branch to stay, I would like to know it, because I 
would like to hack/test some features for python.org and if there are any 
limitations it is better to know about them beforehand.
msg1472 (view) Author: loewis Date: 2009-09-18.07:18:48
There is, of course, a need for a vendor branch: it is the baseline of the code 
that we run. Unfortunately, it isn't used for that, but I wouldn't want to remove 
it.

If you don't need it, just don't check it out.
msg1468 (view) Author: techtonik Date: 2009-09-17.15:31:14
Why it should be kept there?

If there is nobody to do such simple clean up then expect it to grow into a big 
pile of garbage that consumes bandwidth, disk space and braincycles.

Sorry, I do not possess commit privileges to keep Python developers busy with 
important tasks.
msg1467 (view) Author: loewis Date: 2009-09-17.15:13:09
Why is that important?
msg1463 (view) Author: techtonik Date: 2009-09-17.12:20:10
If there is no need for vendor/ subdir in RoundUp SVN, I would vote to remove it 
altogether.

http://svn.python.org/view/tracker/
History
Date User Action Args
2009-09-20 18:57:44techtoniksetmessages: + msg1475
2009-09-18 07:18:48loewissetmessages: + msg1472
2009-09-17 15:31:14techtoniksetmessages: + msg1468
2009-09-17 15:13:09loewissetstatus: unread -> chatting
nosy: + loewis
messages: + msg1467
2009-09-17 12:20:10techtonikcreate